How Long Can Police Hold Your Property for Evidence?

Seized & Stored: Navigating the Maze of Evidence Retention

The question of how long the police can hold your property for evidence can be both straightforward and nuanced, depending on the circumstances.

This answer is based on U.S. law, and while the principles mentioned might be applicable in many jurisdictions, laws may vary depending on the state and specific circumstances of the case.

Short Answer:

Q: How long can the police keep your property for evidence?

A: The police can hold your property as evidence for the duration of an investigation or prosecution.

Once the case is resolved, they're generally obligated to return it unless it's contraband or involved in other ongoing cases.

The length of time property is held as evidence before being returned to the owner can vary widely based on several factors:

1. Nature of the Crime: For serious crimes like homicides, the evidence might be held for a longer period due to the complexities of investigations and trials.

2. Investigative and Prosecutorial Needs: If the property is crucial evidence, it will be retained until the conclusion of the trial or until it's no longer needed for appeals or related cases.

3. Type of Property: Contraband or illegal items (like drugs or certain weapons) may never be returned. Some items might be held for forfeiture proceedings if they were involved in the commission of a crime.

4. Case Backlog: In jurisdictions with a large backlog of cases, evidence might be held longer simply because it takes longer for cases to be processed.

5. Appeals: If a case is appealed, evidence may need to be retained until the appeal process is exhausted.

6. Property Storage and Organizational Protocols: Some law enforcement agencies might have more streamlined processes for evidence cataloging, storage, and return than others.

On average, for less serious crimes or where the property seized isn't central to the case, the property might be returned in a matter of weeks to months.

However, for more serious offenses or critical evidence, it could be years before the property is returned, if at all.

Remember, the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures, so if the property is held without justification, it may be a violation of constitutional rights.

If you believe your property is unlawfully held, you can request its return or consult with an attorney.

Related Questions

• What does the Fourth Amendment say about property seizures?

  The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, ensuring that property isn't arbitrarily taken without proper justification, such as a warrant or a valid exception to the warrant requirement.

• Can the police keep illegal items they find, like drugs or unlicensed weapons?

  Yes, contraband or items illegal to possess will typically not be returned and might be destroyed or used for official purposes like training.

• If my case is dismissed or I'm found not guilty, will I automatically get my property back?

  Not necessarily. While the resolution of a case can make it easier to get property back, you might still need to formally request its return. Additionally, if the property is considered contraband or is connected to other ongoing investigations, it might not be returned.

1. The General Rule:

The police can hold your property as evidence for as long as it is needed for an investigation or prosecution. Once the case has been resolved (either through dismissal, plea, trial, etc.), and there is no longer a legitimate investigative or prosecutorial need to retain the evidence, the police are generally obligated to return the property to its rightful owner.

2. Due Process and the Fourth Amendment:

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. This means that any evidence seized without a proper warrant or without a valid warrant exception might be suppressed and excluded from trial.

Furthermore, the Fourteenth Amendment ensures that individuals are not deprived of their property without due process of law. Holding onto someone's property indefinitely without justification would be a violation of this due process right.

3. Extended Holding Periods:

There might be situations where evidence needs to be held for an extended period. This could be because:

• The case has multiple co-defendants.

• There are appeals being processed.

• The evidence is being used in multiple cases.

• There are ongoing investigations connected to the evidence.

4. Exceptions for Certain Types of Property:

Some types of property, such as firearms or drugs, may never be returned because they are contraband or illegal to possess. In some situations, the property may be subject to forfeiture proceedings if it was used in the commission of a crime or acquired as a result of criminal activity.

5. Relevant Supreme Court Cases:

• United States v. Place (1983): This case dealt with the length of time the police can detain personal luggage for a drug-sniffing dog to inspect it without it being considered an "unreasonable seizure." The Court held that a 90-minute detention was too long.

• Illinois v. McArthur (2001): The Supreme Court held that police could prevent a person from entering his home for two hours while they obtained a search warrant, suggesting that temporary seizures of property, under certain circumstances, can be reasonable.

• Segura v. United States (1984): The Court held that while an initial entry into a home was illegal, the subsequent seizure of evidence under a validly obtained search warrant was lawful. This suggests that even if property is initially unlawfully seized, it might still be used as evidence if later procedures are followed correctly.

6. What to Do if Your Property is Seized:

If your property is seized and you believe it's being held unlawfully:

• Request its return from the law enforcement agency.

• If refused, consult with an attorney.

• Potentially file a motion with the court to have the property returned. This is sometimes referred to as a "motion for the return of property."

7. Preservation of Evidence Post-Conviction:

The Innocence Project and other organizations have highlighted the importance of preserving evidence post-conviction, especially in serious cases like homicides and sexual assaults. This is crucial because future technological advancements, like DNA testing, can lead to exoneration of the wrongly convicted.

In conclusion, while the police can hold property for evidence during the course of an investigation or prosecution, there are constitutional limits on these powers. The specifics can depend greatly on the nature of the crime, the type of property, and the jurisdiction. If there are concerns about unlawfully held property, consulting with legal counsel is advisable.

Conclusion:

In understanding the balance between law enforcement's need to gather evidence and an individual's constitutional rights, it's essential to recognize that while police have the authority to seize property for investigative or prosecutorial purposes, this power isn't unlimited.

The protection against unreasonable seizures, enshrined in the Fourth Amendment, acts as a safeguard.

If you find yourself in a situation where your property is seized, awareness of your rights and available legal avenues is crucial.

Always consider consulting with legal counsel to ensure your rights are upheld and to navigate the complexities of evidence retention.

---

Recent Questions: